|
|
 |
|
Reverse-Oedipus Complexes and British Imperialist Eugenics: Village of the Damned
by Erich Kuersten
|
 |
1960: British
kids in school uniforms with lit-up eyes driving the fearful conservative locals insane with the power of their minds! No,
it ain’t the Who, it’s one of they key horror moments of our modern age. Based on the book The Midwich Cuckoo by John Wyndham (Day of the Triffids), Village of the Damned tells the story of generational conflict between the local populace of a small English hamlet
called Midwich and a rash of weird children born to all the women after an unexplained “consciousness outage.”
Gordon Zellaby (George Sanders) sees it all happen. The local psychiatric big wig, Gordon’s on the phone with his high-ranking
brother in law, Major Allen Berner (Michael Gwynn), as his wife Anthea (Barbara Shelley) flits around in the other room fixing
lunch, when suddenly the town is hit by a force that renders every living thing within an invisible perimeter around the town
unconscious.
After the consciousness
is restored everyone seems unharmed, but the local women are all pregnant (including Anthea), and a few years later groups
of incredibly composed schoolchildren are walking around together, driving any adult or bully who gets in their way to suicide
with their powers of mind control. Gordon and Anthea’s own son is their leader, and uses Gordon to try and help them
escape when the townspeople’s meddling proves too much, and the British government is debating dropping an atom bomb
on the town to get rid of the youngsters. Gordon, who has been championing the kids up to a point, decides to blow them up
using a satchel of dynamite instead.
Interestingly,
Wyndham—a British author—set the original novel in the United States, but the film’s American producers
relocated the shoot to England for tax purposes. It’s hard to imagine the tale being as chilling in the U.S.A, a land
where everyone is used to passing out, waking up pregnant, and giving birth to blonde-eyed monsters that drive them insane.
For the Brits such an event must be an especially difficult challenge to their stiff-upper-lipped reserve. In fact, the Midwich
residents can hardly even discuss these things even amongst themselves. This is still the era when men l pace the waiting
room, furiously smoking cigars, rather than shouting “Breathe, Honey, breathe” in a surgical gown and mask. Whereas
Americans would be swarming around the kids like a tourist attraction, or burning the virgin moms at the stake in puritanical
hysteria, the stalwart Midwichers merely “think of England” and carry on as if it
didn’t happen. As the bobby in The Invisible Man (1933) might say: “Nothing
to see here, move along.”
In fact, this
sense of British propriety is what creates the problem in the first place. By contrast we learn that a similarly-inflicted
Inuit tribe in Northern Alaska has killed all their batch of blonde kids at birth, as per
tribal custom. In Outer Mongolia, an outbreak resulted in not just the children, but the
mothers being killed. In Midwich these sort of barbaric bud-nippings don’t happen—this is England! As a colonizing nation they scoff at primitive superstitions which view
the unborn as vampiric--neither alive nor dead—until they are born and initiated into society. One look at these weird
kids and the primitives knew they could never be initiated and so they were pulled like weeds from the group garden. Alas,
even without this genetic “early warning system” our modern society has no initiation the equivalent of the traumatic,
transformative, primitive rite that makes a child bonded to the tribe body and soul. The casting of the modern child out of
the house and into public school is probably the closest we offer, and it usually has the reverse effect, turning the child
even further inwards as a defense against bullies, gym class, and condescending teachers. Whereas in primitive societies the
initiation creates an individual member of the tribe, to be respected and acknowledged, out of the raw manifestation of ambivalent
nature that is an infant, in civilized society the reverse holds true. The British children are taken from their privileged
place in the household, put into identical school uniforms, and sent off into cold, gray world en masse. Not only are they thus depersonalized, the fetishistic
school uniforms they are made to keep them trapped in a “separate” status, as objects of sexual desire and power.
Their school uniforms are models of pedophilic kinkiness; the militaristic top half (suit and tie) and the sexualized nakedness
of the bottom (shorts) mirrors the cabaret outfits of Weimar-era Berlin, placing these Aryan-looking children into a position
of objectified other a priori to any revelation of advanced intelligence.
In 1960, we must remember that Britain
still was only fifteen years from the end of World War Two. In the post-9/11 world of today we may suffer a certain amount
of anxiety, but can such anxiety compare with that of a typical Londoner during the blitz of 1939-45? The destruction of the
Twin Towers
is not a nightly occurrence. The Aryan blonde, emotionless coldness of the Midwich children certainly echoes trauma still
buried in the fear centers of many an Englishman (an equivalent might be if white, “Jesus fearing” middle Americans
suddenly were giving birth to Muslims). One must remember too, that the colonizing British must harbor some suppressed well
of collective suspicion theirs a good ass-kicking still coming their way. He who conquers by the sword will be conquered by
the rocket, so to speak. But the oppressed have stopped conquering with swords
and bombs, now they invade via immigration, until London is full of Pakistanis, Paris full
of Arabs, Washington D.C.
full of African Americans.
Unlike Britain however, Americans are proud to be without a class structure, racially
defined or otherwise. In Britain a chimney
sweep will still supplicate before a doctor, thus the fear and hostility accorded the children by the uneducated locals makes
more sense than it would in an American town. If the intellectual leaders of Midwich are to be made lower class citizens—if
the doctor is to become the new chimney sweep—then what will happen to the chimney sweep? He will be bumped one peg
lower… bumped off, in fact, and he knows it well in advance of the paradigm shift. Like the humans they walk among,
the Midwich children are class conscious, treating the upper class, i.e. the Major and George Sanders with some respect (The
kids hurt the major at one point, but don’t kill him) while the local yokels are treated the way German soldiers might
treat the peasants in an occupied town, with punishments that vastly outweigh the infractions.
Another unmistakably English element
is the suburban/rural environment. The locals are trapped there in a way that is unimaginable in the car-centric America of the same age. Remember the big American
horror of the same year was Psycho, which involves a roadside motel where “the
highway was moved.” The highway is still somewhat near, but just being a mile or two away from it is enough to cause
anxiety. Midwich isn’t near any highway; it’s connected only to the next hamlet via a winding country lane populated
by parsons on bicycles and farmers in their quaint pick-ups. It’s provincial in a way Yankees can’t even understand
as connected by thoroughfares and televisions as they are. The government representatives travel by car into town to figure
out what to do, and if necessary they will drop an atom bomb without anyone ever knowing. The town is never “connected”
to the rest of the country or world in any clear way.
We can see how less effective the story is when moved to America
in John Carpenter’s 1995 remake. Here the kids have been re-imagined to look like a bunch of surfer brats from Venice Beach rather
than some Aryan/Alien V2 mishmash of unfocused paranoia. The only way Carpenter can even begin to duplicate the sense of being
“cut off” is by moving the town deep in the New Mexico desert, then establishing a sense of community-- which
doesn’t really exist in America anymore--via scenes involving the residents all getting ready for a big picnic, which
he bathes in golden hues and sets to acoustic guitar music. It doesn’t work as well as the gloom of the English countryside,
where the towns seem always deserted and unnaturally quiet, but the sense of community is still genuinely thick.
Gordon’s “Britishness”
is also an important facet of the film, as his ability to repress emotions helps when it subtly becomes apparent to him that
he’s responsible for the presence of these children. As a resident ‘intellectual leader’ of the town, he
is, due the class construct, an authority figure; he “creates the symbolic order.” So when Anthea announces her
pregnancy, his joy indicates they have been hoping to have a child well past the point they could expect to conceive, and
now his prayers have been answered as if via telegram from the British government. As viewers who have already seen the movie
poster or know the gist of the plot, we can’t help but feel in on some dark joke due to the swelling, happiness of Ron
Goodwin’s clever score. It’s an interesting choice in cues, as usually music seems to “know” the future.
In this way, Gordon’s perceptions of reality set the standard for the film. When he’s happy, the music is happy;
when he’s scared, the music is scary. When he suspects the children are his own dark Monkeys Paw-style wish come true,
he hides it even from the composer... Brits are masters of subterfuge!
But happy as the music might
make Gordon out to be, the rash of mysterious pregnancies aren’t all so well received in the rest of Midwich, especially
with the unmarried “good” girls. Janet Fall attempts suicide over the news, and the other, less wealthy or unmarried
ones get the short end of the system’s stick; they’re considered sullied in reputation (even though they are technically
still virgins) as it’s easier for a patriarchy to accept a woman’s guilt over its own failure (as in the tendency
to assume “she was asking for it” in rape cases). This is yet another region in which the film’s British-ness
works to its fear-factoring advantage, as the realm of medicine is socialized, linking the child birth process of the poor
with the evil epistemological eye of Big Brother. We see this in a key scene where a mobile medical unit has been set up in
the town to monitor the moms-to-be (the poor ones, who unlike Anthea can’t afford private care). The camera POV is from
above, looking down on the women coming in and out of the truck, their heads hung in shame, as if inviting us to see them
as test subjects under the microscope. The shot seems to link the government, aliens the world of medicine the way the TV
show The X-Files would later do, drawing sinister conclusions about who really owns and controls a woman’s womb.
When the babies are finally born, there
is again a sense in the suddenly optimistic musical cue that things may go all right for Gordon. But it doesn’t last
long. The dog is the first to suspect things are not all right, by growling nonstop at the baby, christened David. Then Gordon
begins to get jealous too. “Handsome, isn’t he?” he says of the child, but beneath that British reserve
one can sense the faint hint of a reverse Oedipal complex – with the son already having more power over the mother than
the father does. David will later employ this power to force Anthea to scald herself when the water in his bottle is too hot,
and one can only imagine what other infantile urges the child forces his mother to gratify.
When there is an invasion of otherworldly
evil it is common for the main character to have some sub-Freudian link with it, some barely tangible connection that only
the weird old, cackling old woman at the bar can see. It was the boiling over sexuality of 1950’s teenagers that caused
the giant insects in all those old bug movies, not the A-Bomb, though what’s the difference? Each is a metaphor for
the other. Gordon cannot reconcile the reverse-Oedipal urge to kill his kid with the buried suspicion that his wishing brought
the stork of Satan down upon them all. So rather than admitting he made a mistake, he wants to find some good therein. He
starts arguing that the Midwich spawn are not inherently evil, but just at that pre-empathetic stage of all infants; there
is good to be found in them, and fun things to study and learn about the human mind. A parallel in the 21st century
would be the childless couple who wind up with deformed quintuplets after signing up with an insane fertility doctor, and
yet manage to convince themselves their lives are somehow changed for the better.
Thus Gordon becomes an unwitting traitor
to himself and the town. He uses his position as a leader to admonish the military and government officials to allow him to
study the intelligence of the children on his own, arguing that they should be allowed to live together in a schoolroom. “Children
are not good or evil” he exclaims, but his brother-in-law the Major is concerned: “What if we can’t put
the moral breaks on them?” This is a legitimate worry—if they know you can never spank them, why should they ever
listen? And Gordon’s disinclination to approve of their extermination distinctly sets the field of science/eugenics
up against humanity’s own survival. The sense of taboo that resulted in the Intuit and Mongolian children being killed
at birth doesn’t exist for the civilized man, who has to wait until the children have grown so big powerful only nuclear
strikes will do the trick (which becomes the fate of two other damned “civilized” villages). In this context,
Gordon becomes his own bad guy, like Dr. Carrington in The Thing (1951) shouting:
“You’re wiser than we are, you must understand!” as James Arness gets ready to clobber him with a chunk
of wood.
That the Major and others give into Gordon’s
ill-advised wish is again due to their Britishness (Kenneth Tobey would have just shoved him aside) and the fact that these
are their children too, and rebellion and “difference” is not all that
unusual (the major’s parents may have wanted to kill him when he was a kid,
too). The comic book/movie series X-Men follows a similar tack, with the mutants
finding refuge at a school helmed by Charles Xavier, the master of mind control. It’s a misunderstood teen fantasy of
letting all the freaks go live together since the adults hate them so much. Like some pint-sized biker gang, the Hitler Youth
or a rock band, they “all want to dress alike,” and walk around the streets like they own the place. They are
part of a new movement, the dawn of the eugenic-counterculture. Parents are yesterday’s papers. At one point Gordon
even asks them; “What do you kids want?” The kids reply: “We want you to leave us alone!”
This request which would later become
immortalized in Pink Floyd’s The Wall, a 1982 rock film chronicling a fascistic
rock star’s childhood in post-war England. And as in that film, the adults simply cannot leave their little Nazi progeny
alone. When faced with a higher or different intellect than themselves, the parents must try to understand, meddle and control
and failing that, destroy them rather than be made irrelevant. “If you didn’t suffer from emotions, you would
be as strong as we are,” David says to Gordon at one point, indicating that what the adults see as their “humanity”
is something the Midwich children have transcended, and in short: “if you want to find out what’s behind these
blue eyes/ you’ll have to claw you’re way through this disguise” (2).
It has long been a source of fascination
with UFO theorists that if humans could access our entire brains, we would be able to recognize and harness powers which we
now think of as “alien.” Some go so far as to speculate that alien “DNA dampeners” are what keep that
other 90% of our minds inactive. We could be as strong as the Midwich kids if our
minds weren’t mostly shut off as a result of some higher being’s tampering. When David’s “real”
extra-dimensional father last pulled his “induce sleep and artificially inseminate” business it may have been
with apes at the dawn of time. He made sure to lower the wattage of our alien chromosomes, but for this next go-round, he’s
turning the dimmer switch up to “bright.” Gordon notes that the children’s’ power has no limit, any
more “than there is a limit to the power of the human mind.” Emotions and feeling may just be what we have instead,
the filler, the last few remnants of our shouting, ass-grabbing monkey ancestors.
But we are still bound by our own
compassion as human viewers, and any compassion we had for these “different” kids is compromised when they start
killing more and more innocent people. When the drunken crowd at the pub decides to go burn down the schoolhouse, the scene
in its way links the Universal 1940’s “torch wielding villagers” with the drunken posse of Sam Peckinpah’s
Straw Dogs (1971). Like Dustin Hoffman in that film, Gordon stands between the
villagers and their prey, guided by his sense of superiority as an intellectual. Not that he is really needed, as the kids
make the leader of the mob self-immolate with her own torch. The horror of this scene also further estranges us from whatever
sympathy we harbor for the misunderstood “cool” kids. Our own sense of superiority to the lower class townspeople
is called into question when our identification with the kids is continually turned back in our faces. They in fact become
the new adults. They are too powerful and amoral even for us, the infantile viewers. Thus when Gordon brings his satchel full
of dynamite and brain full of brick walls into the schoolroom, he is now the child.
He is the rock and roll rebel who is going to blow up the school as a symbol of rebellion against of his social rulers. As the audience we have become anti- our own hierarchal constructs. We may as well
be singing “we don’t need no education / we don’t need no thought control” as we hammer the brick
walls of the classroom down around us.
(Note: Excerpted from Van Helsing's
Journal #2, 2002)
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
c. 2001, 2009 - Erich Kuersten
|
|
|
 |